Back to Voice & realtime

Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview vs Eleven v3 Conversational

Compare Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview and Eleven v3 Conversational using the same provider-sourced voice & realtime rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.

Facts checked September 4, 2026

Quick take

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview

Google's preview audio-to-audio model for low-latency dialogue with multimodal awareness, thinking, search grounding, and function calling.

Best for

  • Multimodal voice assistants
  • Google search-grounded live experiences
  • Low-cost audio experimentation

Watch out for

The model is preview, and paid versus unpaid projects have different data-use terms. Confirm both before capturing sensitive conversations.

Eleven v3 Conversational

ElevenLabs' expressive realtime text-to-speech model for natural dialogue, emotional delivery, audio tags, and more than 70 languages.

Best for

  • Expressive support and assistant voices
  • Multilingual interactive characters
  • Agent stacks that already supply reasoning and tools

Watch out for

It is not a complete speech-to-speech agent by itself. End-to-end latency also includes transcription, LLM response time, transport, and playback.

Compare the published facts

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview vs Eleven v3 Conversational

Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.

Voice & realtimeGemini 3.1 Flash Live PreviewEleven v3 Conversational
Price basisToken-, character-, or minute-based price for the listed access route.Audio $0.005/min in · $0.018/min out$0.05 / 1K characters
Interaction modeSpeech-to-speech, audio-to-audio, or streamed text-to-speech behavior.Realtime audio-to-audio, multimodal inputRealtime text-to-speech / text-to-dialogue
Published latencyProvider-published measurement with its stated exclusions; not a Cody test.Not published~280ms, excluding app/network
LanguagesProvider-documented language coverage or a clear unpublished marker.Multilingual; verify current Live API support70+ languages
Tools & controlNative function calling, reasoning, or speech-control features.Function calling and search groundingAudio tags; orchestration handled by your agent stack
Context or input limitDocumented token or character limit where it is meaningful.131,072 input · 65,536 output5K-character guidance for v3 family; verify endpoint

How to choose

Compare the job, not the hype.

Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview

Google says paid Gemini API content is not used to improve its products; unpaid service data generally can be. Confirm billing status and current terms before sending sensitive conversations.

Eleven v3 Conversational

ElevenLabs says enterprise customer data is not used for training by default. Other users can opt out of model improvement; enterprise zero-retention and regional environments are available with plan-specific limits.

Frequently asked questions

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview vs Eleven v3 Conversational FAQ

What is the main difference between Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview and Eleven v3 Conversational?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview: Google's preview audio-to-audio model for low-latency dialogue with multimodal awareness, thinking, search grounding, and function calling. Eleven v3 Conversational: ElevenLabs' expressive realtime text-to-speech model for natural dialogue, emotional delivery, audio tags, and more than 70 languages.

Should I choose Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview or Eleven v3 Conversational?

Consider Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview when your priority is Multimodal voice assistants. Consider Eleven v3 Conversational when your priority is Expressive support and assistant voices. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.

Is this Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview vs Eleven v3 Conversational comparison based on Cody benchmarks?

No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Voice & realtime category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.