Back to World models
Model comparison
Genie 3 vs Oasis 3
Compare Genie 3 and Oasis 3 using the same provider-sourced world models rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.
Facts checked September 4, 2026
Quick take
Genie 3
Google DeepMind's research world model for generating photorealistic, controllable environments that can be explored in real time from a text description.
Best for
- Understanding the frontier of interactive world generation
- Research demos and agent-environment exploration
- Evaluating Project Genie when eligible
Watch out for
Do not plan a production integration around it until Google publishes general API access, service terms, pricing, and retention details.
Oasis 3
Decart's action-conditioned world model for physical-AI training, generating synchronized, controllable simulation views in real time.
Best for
- Autonomous-vehicle edge-case simulation
- Closed-loop physical-AI training
- Teams exploring generated alternatives to fixed simulators
Watch out for
Self-serve pricing, broad country coverage, retention, and training-use terms are not published on the model page; obtain them contractually.
Compare the published facts
Genie 3 vs Oasis 3
Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.
| World models | Genie 3 | Oasis 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price basisPublic API cost where available; research and private-beta models may not publish one. | Not published | Not publicly listed |
| Access stagePublic API, research experiment, partner onboarding, or private beta. | Research experiment / Project Genie | API / partner access |
| What it createsThe kind of interactive environment or embodied experience produced. | Realtime photorealistic navigable world | Action-conditioned physical-AI simulator |
| InteractionPublished frame rate, latency, or realtime behavior with its original basis. | 20–24 fps | 22 fps; under 200ms end-to-end claim |
| Visual outputProvider-published resolution or output format where available. | 720p | 512×768×3 synchronized views |
| API accessWhether developers can integrate the model today and under what access model. | No general developer API | Yes, onboarding may be required |
How to choose
Compare the job, not the hype.
Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.
Genie 3
No general developer API data policy is published for this research-access entry. Review Project Genie terms before uploading confidential prompts or reference material.
Provider and API links
Oasis 3
The model page does not state a complete API training-use or retention policy. Physical-AI teams should obtain contractual data-handling terms before contributing proprietary scenarios or fleet data.
Provider and API links
Frequently asked questions
Genie 3 vs Oasis 3 FAQ
What is the main difference between Genie 3 and Oasis 3?
Genie 3: Google DeepMind's research world model for generating photorealistic, controllable environments that can be explored in real time from a text description. Oasis 3: Decart's action-conditioned world model for physical-AI training, generating synchronized, controllable simulation views in real time.
Should I choose Genie 3 or Oasis 3?
Consider Genie 3 when your priority is Understanding the frontier of interactive world generation. Consider Oasis 3 when your priority is Autonomous-vehicle edge-case simulation. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.
Is this Genie 3 vs Oasis 3 comparison based on Cody benchmarks?
No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the World models category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.