Back to Text & reasoning
Model comparison
Grok 4.6 vs Mistral Small 4
Compare Grok 4.6 and Mistral Small 4 using the same provider-sourced text & reasoning rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.
Facts checked September 4, 2026
Estimate your cost
Set your usage. Your estimate updates as you type.
Example: 6,000 input tokens for 10 pages, plus a 500-token summary. Page lengths vary; adjust the numbers below.
One run sends your input to the model once and receives an answer. Tokens are pieces of text: input is what you send, output is the answer you receive.
Advanced options
How this estimate works
Estimates exclude taxes, tools, cache storage/writes, free allowances and custom discounts. Image estimates cover output only, not prompt or reference-image charges. Quality modes differ by model. Unlisted settings are not treated as free.
| Model | Access | Estimated total (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Mistral Small 4Mistral AI | Mistral AI | $0.0012 |
| Grok 4.6SpaceXAI | SpaceXAI | No reviewed rate |
Quick take
Grok 4.6
SpaceXAI's frontier text-and-image model for coding, agentic tasks, and knowledge work, with direct web, X, and code tools.
Best for
- Coding agents with live web or X context
- Tool-heavy knowledge workflows
- Teams already building on OpenAI-compatible APIs
Watch out for
Published regions are narrower than a generic 'global' label, and the base token rate doubles for long-context requests.
Mistral Small 4
Mistral's lower-cost open model that combines normal instruction following, reasoning, coding, vision, and agent tools in one endpoint.
Best for
- Cost-sensitive production assistants
- Coding and tool use on one flexible model
- Self-hosted text-and-image applications
Watch out for
Sparse activation lowers inference work but does not make the full 119B checkpoint small. Size hardware around the actual quantization and context you plan to serve.
Compare the published facts
Grok 4.6 vs Mistral Small 4
Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.
| Text & reasoning | Grok 4.6 | Mistral Small 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Context windowMaximum combined prompt and working context documented by the provider. | 500K tokens | 256K tokens combined |
| Maximum outputProvider-published response limit, where available. | No published text cap | Not separately published |
| Knowledge cutoffLatest reliable knowledge date explicitly published by the model provider. Search and connected tools can retrieve newer information but do not change the model's built-in cutoff. | January 2026 | Not published |
| Input priceCurrent standard list price per million input tokens unless noted. | $2 / 1M | $0.15 / 1M |
| Output priceCurrent standard list price per million output tokens unless noted. | $6 / 1M | $0.60 / 1M |
| InputsMedia types accepted by the listed model endpoint. | Text, image | Text, image |
| Tools & agentsSelected native tools and agent-building capabilities, not an exhaustive list. | Functions, web/X search, code execution | Functions, agents, built-in tools, structured and predicted outputs |
How to choose
Compare the job, not the hype.
Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.
Grok 4.6
SpaceXAI says API inputs and outputs are never used for training without explicit permission. Requests are encrypted and retained for 30 days by default; team-level zero data retention is available with feature tradeoffs.
Provider and API links
Mistral Small 4
Mistral's commercial terms exclude model training by default except when a customer opts in or uses designated Labs or preview models. Self-hosting keeps inference data under the operator's controls; hosted API retention is generally 30 days unless zero data retention is enabled.
Provider and API links
Frequently asked questions
Grok 4.6 vs Mistral Small 4 FAQ
What is the main difference between Grok 4.6 and Mistral Small 4?
Grok 4.6: SpaceXAI's frontier text-and-image model for coding, agentic tasks, and knowledge work, with direct web, X, and code tools. Mistral Small 4: Mistral's lower-cost open model that combines normal instruction following, reasoning, coding, vision, and agent tools in one endpoint.
Should I choose Grok 4.6 or Mistral Small 4?
Consider Grok 4.6 when your priority is Coding agents with live web or X context. Consider Mistral Small 4 when your priority is Cost-sensitive production assistants. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.
Is this Grok 4.6 vs Mistral Small 4 comparison based on Cody benchmarks?
No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Text & reasoning category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.