Back to Video generation

Model comparison

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 vs Seedance 2.5

Compare Grok Imagine Video 1.5 and Seedance 2.5 using the same provider-sourced video generation rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.

Facts checked September 4, 2026

Estimate your cost

Set your usage. Your estimate updates as you type.

Example: 8-second, 720p clips with audio. Models that do not support these settings will not receive an estimate.

How this estimate works

Estimates exclude taxes, tools, cache storage/writes, free allowances and custom discounts. Image estimates cover output only, not prompt or reference-image charges. Quality modes differ by model. Unlisted settings are not treated as free.

Estimate your cost
ModelEstimated total (USD)
Grok Imagine Video 1.5SpaceXAINo reviewed rate
Seedance 2.5ByteDance SeedNo reviewed rate

Quick take

Grok Imagine Video 1.5

SpaceXAI's current video model for turning text, images, or references into short clips with optional generated speech and sound.

Best for

  • Short sound-on marketing clips
  • Grok-based image and video workflows
  • Reference-guided video experiments

Watch out for

Reference-to-video output is capped at 720p, generated download URLs are temporary, and complex requests can take several minutes to complete.

Seedance 2.5

ByteDance's current audiovisual model for coherent clips up to 30 seconds, with native sound, long-form storytelling, rich references, and targeted editing.

Best for

  • Sound-on social and advertising videos
  • Longer AI clips with multiple shots
  • Reference-heavy audiovisual production

Watch out for

fal bills by a video-token formula tied to frame size and duration, so aspect ratio changes the cost. Confirm which route supports the resolution and reference mix you need.

Compare the published facts

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 vs Seedance 2.5

Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.

Video generationGrok Imagine Video 1.5Seedance 2.5
Generation priceCurrent list price per generated second or the provider's closest billing unit.$0.08 480p · $0.14 720p · $0.25 1080p / sec$0.0214 / 1K video tokens on fal
Clip durationDocumented duration choices or maximum clip length.1–15 seconds4–30 seconds; official extensions supported
Maximum outputHighest provider-documented output resolution, with relevant constraints.1080p; references capped at 720p720p text route; fal image route also lists 1080p
Native audioWhether the endpoint generates synchronized audio with video.Yes; can be disabledYes, jointly generated with video
Input modesSupported text, image, video, reference, or motion inputs.Text, image, or references to videoText, image, video, audio, and reference assets
Generation timeOnly shown when a provider publishes a range; not a Cody benchmark.Typically up to several minutesNot published

How to choose

Compare the job, not the hype.

Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.

Grok Imagine Video 1.5

SpaceXAI says API inputs and outputs are not used for training without explicit permission. Default encrypted retention is 30 days; team-level zero data retention is available with feature tradeoffs.

Seedance 2.5

fal stores request inputs and outputs by default. Its X-Fal-Store-IO: 0 request header prevents payload storage, but uploaded CDN files need separate lifecycle handling; other Seedance routes have their own terms.

Frequently asked questions

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 vs Seedance 2.5 FAQ

What is the main difference between Grok Imagine Video 1.5 and Seedance 2.5?

Grok Imagine Video 1.5: SpaceXAI's current video model for turning text, images, or references into short clips with optional generated speech and sound. Seedance 2.5: ByteDance's current audiovisual model for coherent clips up to 30 seconds, with native sound, long-form storytelling, rich references, and targeted editing.

Should I choose Grok Imagine Video 1.5 or Seedance 2.5?

Consider Grok Imagine Video 1.5 when your priority is Short sound-on marketing clips. Consider Seedance 2.5 when your priority is Sound-on social and advertising videos. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.

Is this Grok Imagine Video 1.5 vs Seedance 2.5 comparison based on Cody benchmarks?

No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Video generation category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.