Back to World models
Model comparison
Oasis 3 vs Runway GWM-1 Avatars
Compare Oasis 3 and Runway GWM-1 Avatars using the same provider-sourced world models rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.
Facts checked September 4, 2026
Quick take
Oasis 3
Decart's action-conditioned world model for physical-AI training, generating synchronized, controllable simulation views in real time.
Best for
- Autonomous-vehicle edge-case simulation
- Closed-loop physical-AI training
- Teams exploring generated alternatives to fixed simulators
Watch out for
Self-serve pricing, broad country coverage, retention, and training-use terms are not published on the model page; obtain them contractually.
Runway GWM-1 Avatars
The public conversational-character surface of Runway's General World Model, creating realtime visual personas from one reference image.
Best for
- Website and app characters
- Realtime tutors, hosts, and support personas
- Visual agents with knowledge and tool access
Watch out for
Plan around session limits and explicitly govern voice rights, reference images, transcripts, recordings, knowledge documents, and external tools.
Compare the published facts
Oasis 3 vs Runway GWM-1 Avatars
Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.
| World models | Oasis 3 | Runway GWM-1 Avatars |
|---|---|---|
| Price basisPublic API cost where available; research and private-beta models may not publish one. | Not publicly listed | 2 credits upfront + 2 / 6 seconds |
| Access stagePublic API, research experiment, partner onboarding, or private beta. | API / partner access | Public API |
| What it createsThe kind of interactive environment or embodied experience produced. | Action-conditioned physical-AI simulator | Realtime conversational character |
| InteractionPublished frame rate, latency, or realtime behavior with its original basis. | 22 fps; under 200ms end-to-end claim | Live WebRTC session |
| Visual outputProvider-published resolution or output format where available. | 512×768×3 synchronized views | Endpoint-managed avatar stream |
| API accessWhether developers can integrate the model today and under what access model. | Yes, onboarding may be required | Yes, Runway Characters API |
How to choose
Compare the job, not the hype.
Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.
Oasis 3
The model page does not state a complete API training-use or retention policy. Physical-AI teams should obtain contractual data-handling terms before contributing proprietary scenarios or fleet data.
Provider and API links
Runway GWM-1 Avatars
Data handling depends on the Runway plan and agreement. Review retention, recordings, transcripts, voice rights, and knowledge-base handling before deploying a customer-facing character.
Provider and API links
Frequently asked questions
Oasis 3 vs Runway GWM-1 Avatars FAQ
What is the main difference between Oasis 3 and Runway GWM-1 Avatars?
Oasis 3: Decart's action-conditioned world model for physical-AI training, generating synchronized, controllable simulation views in real time. Runway GWM-1 Avatars: The public conversational-character surface of Runway's General World Model, creating realtime visual personas from one reference image.
Should I choose Oasis 3 or Runway GWM-1 Avatars?
Consider Oasis 3 when your priority is Autonomous-vehicle edge-case simulation. Consider Runway GWM-1 Avatars when your priority is Website and app characters. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.
Is this Oasis 3 vs Runway GWM-1 Avatars comparison based on Cody benchmarks?
No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the World models category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.