Back to Video generation
Model comparison
Sora 2 vs Veo 3.1
Compare Sora 2 and Veo 3.1 using the same provider-sourced video generation rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.
Facts checked September 4, 2026
Estimate your cost
Set your usage. Your estimate updates as you type.
Example: 8-second, 720p clips with audio. Models that do not support these settings will not receive an estimate.
How this estimate works
Estimates exclude taxes, tools, cache storage/writes, free allowances and custom discounts. Image estimates cover output only, not prompt or reference-image charges. Quality modes differ by model. Unlisted settings are not treated as free.
Quick take
Sora 2
OpenAI's legacy synced-audio video model for short text- or image-guided clips—still documented, but approaching a permanent API shutdown.
Best for
- Evaluating an existing Sora integration
- Short synced-audio experiments before shutdown
- Planning a migration to another video provider
Watch out for
The API shutdown is imminent. Treat every new dependency on Sora 2 as temporary and export anything you need to keep.
Veo 3.1
Google's preview video model for text-, image-, and video-guided generation with native audio and output options up to 4K.
Best for
- Short cinematic clips with native audio
- 4K experiments and video extension
- Google-centric media pipelines
Watch out for
It remains a preview model. Regional person-generation rules, two-day server retention, and resolution/duration constraints need product-level handling.
Compare the published facts
Sora 2 vs Veo 3.1
Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.
| Video generation | Sora 2 | Veo 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Generation priceCurrent list price per generated second or the provider's closest billing unit. | $0.10 / generated second | $0.40/s standard with audio |
| Clip durationDocumented duration choices or maximum clip length. | 4, 8, or 12 seconds | 4, 6, or 8 seconds |
| Maximum outputHighest provider-documented output resolution, with relevant constraints. | 720×1280 or 1280×720 | Up to 4K; 1080p/4K require 8s |
| Native audioWhether the endpoint generates synchronized audio with video. | Yes, synced audio | Yes |
| Input modesSupported text, image, video, reference, or motion inputs. | Text or image to video | Text, image, or video to video |
| Generation timeOnly shown when a provider publishes a range; not a Cody benchmark. | Not published | Official range: 11s–6m |
How to choose
Compare the job, not the hype.
Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.
Sora 2
OpenAI says API inputs and outputs are not used for training by default. Standard abuse-monitoring and feature-specific storage controls apply until the service shuts down.
Provider and API links
Veo 3.1
Google says paid Gemini API content is not used to improve its products. Generated videos are retained on the server for two days and should be downloaded during that window.
Provider and API links
Frequently asked questions
Sora 2 vs Veo 3.1 FAQ
What is the main difference between Sora 2 and Veo 3.1?
Sora 2: OpenAI's legacy synced-audio video model for short text- or image-guided clips—still documented, but approaching a permanent API shutdown. Veo 3.1: Google's preview video model for text-, image-, and video-guided generation with native audio and output options up to 4K.
Should I choose Sora 2 or Veo 3.1?
Consider Sora 2 when your priority is Evaluating an existing Sora integration. Consider Veo 3.1 when your priority is Short cinematic clips with native audio. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.
Is this Sora 2 vs Veo 3.1 comparison based on Cody benchmarks?
No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Video generation category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.