Back to Video generation

Model comparison

Veo 3.1 Fast vs LTX-2.5 Pro

Compare Veo 3.1 Fast and LTX-2.5 Pro using the same provider-sourced video generation rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.

Facts checked September 4, 2026

Estimate your cost

Set your usage. Your estimate updates as you type.

Example: 8-second, 720p clips with audio. Models that do not support these settings will not receive an estimate.

How this estimate works

Estimates exclude taxes, tools, cache storage/writes, free allowances and custom discounts. Image estimates cover output only, not prompt or reference-image charges. Quality modes differ by model. Unlisted settings are not treated as free.

Estimate your cost
ModelEstimated total (USD)
Veo 3.1 FastGoogle$0.80
LTX-2.5 ProLightricksNo reviewed rate

Quick take

Veo 3.1 Fast

Google's lower-cost Veo 3.1 variant for quickly creating short video clips with native audio and output options up to 4K.

Best for

  • Rapid ad and social-video variations
  • Short clips that need generated audio
  • Teams seeking a lower-cost route into Veo

Watch out for

Fast does not mean instant: Google says video requests can still take from seconds to several minutes at peak times. Generated files are retained for two days, and feature combinations vary by endpoint.

LTX-2.5 Pro

Lightricks' quality-focused video model for making 720p or 1080p clips from text, images, or audio with native sound.

Best for

  • Short 1080p creative video
  • Audio-led or image-led animation
  • Shot-based production with predictable unit cost

Watch out for

Native audio is on by default and adds creative variables that need review. Test dialogue, voice consistency, shot boundaries, and the exact frame-rate option before scaling a production workflow.

Compare the published facts

Veo 3.1 Fast vs LTX-2.5 Pro

Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.

Video generationVeo 3.1 FastLTX-2.5 Pro
Generation priceCurrent list price per generated second or the provider's closest billing unit.$0.10 720p · $0.12 1080p · $0.30 4K / sec$0.12/s 720p · $0.17/s 1080p
Clip durationDocumented duration choices or maximum clip length.4, 6, or 8 seconds6, 8, or 10 seconds
Maximum outputHighest provider-documented output resolution, with relevant constraints.4K at 8 seconds1080p
Native audioWhether the endpoint generates synchronized audio with video.Yes, always onYes; enabled by default
Input modesSupported text, image, video, reference, or motion inputs.Text, image, or video to videoText, image, or audio
Generation timeOnly shown when a provider publishes a range; not a Cody benchmark.11 seconds–6 minutes at peakNot published

How to choose

Compare the job, not the hype.

Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.

Veo 3.1 Fast

Google's paid Gemini API terms say prompts and responses are not used to improve its products. Generated Veo videos are stored on the server for two days and must be downloaded to keep them.

LTX-2.5 Pro

The reviewed public LTX model and pricing guides do not state one complete endpoint-specific retention or training-use commitment. Verify current account and enterprise terms for sensitive media.

Frequently asked questions

Veo 3.1 Fast vs LTX-2.5 Pro FAQ

What is the main difference between Veo 3.1 Fast and LTX-2.5 Pro?

Veo 3.1 Fast: Google's lower-cost Veo 3.1 variant for quickly creating short video clips with native audio and output options up to 4K. LTX-2.5 Pro: Lightricks' quality-focused video model for making 720p or 1080p clips from text, images, or audio with native sound.

Should I choose Veo 3.1 Fast or LTX-2.5 Pro?

Consider Veo 3.1 Fast when your priority is Rapid ad and social-video variations. Consider LTX-2.5 Pro when your priority is Short 1080p creative video. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.

Is this Veo 3.1 Fast vs LTX-2.5 Pro comparison based on Cody benchmarks?

No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Video generation category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.