Back to Video generation
Model comparison
Veo 3.1 vs Veo 3.1 Fast
Compare Veo 3.1 and Veo 3.1 Fast using the same provider-sourced video generation rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.
Facts checked September 4, 2026
Estimate your cost
Set your usage. Your estimate updates as you type.
Example: 8-second, 720p clips with audio. Models that do not support these settings will not receive an estimate.
How this estimate works
Estimates exclude taxes, tools, cache storage/writes, free allowances and custom discounts. Image estimates cover output only, not prompt or reference-image charges. Quality modes differ by model. Unlisted settings are not treated as free.
| Model | Access | Estimated total (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Veo 3.1 FastGoogle | $0.80 | |
| Veo 3.1Google | $3.20 |
Quick take
Veo 3.1
Google's preview video model for text-, image-, and video-guided generation with native audio and output options up to 4K.
Best for
- Short cinematic clips with native audio
- 4K experiments and video extension
- Google-centric media pipelines
Watch out for
It remains a preview model. Regional person-generation rules, two-day server retention, and resolution/duration constraints need product-level handling.
Veo 3.1 Fast
Google's lower-cost Veo 3.1 variant for quickly creating short video clips with native audio and output options up to 4K.
Best for
- Rapid ad and social-video variations
- Short clips that need generated audio
- Teams seeking a lower-cost route into Veo
Watch out for
Fast does not mean instant: Google says video requests can still take from seconds to several minutes at peak times. Generated files are retained for two days, and feature combinations vary by endpoint.
Compare the published facts
Veo 3.1 vs Veo 3.1 Fast
Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.
| Video generation | Veo 3.1 | Veo 3.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Generation priceCurrent list price per generated second or the provider's closest billing unit. | $0.40/s standard with audio | $0.10 720p · $0.12 1080p · $0.30 4K / sec |
| Clip durationDocumented duration choices or maximum clip length. | 4, 6, or 8 seconds | 4, 6, or 8 seconds |
| Maximum outputHighest provider-documented output resolution, with relevant constraints. | Up to 4K; 1080p/4K require 8s | 4K at 8 seconds |
| Native audioWhether the endpoint generates synchronized audio with video. | Yes | Yes, always on |
| Input modesSupported text, image, video, reference, or motion inputs. | Text, image, or video to video | Text, image, or video to video |
| Generation timeOnly shown when a provider publishes a range; not a Cody benchmark. | Official range: 11s–6m | 11 seconds–6 minutes at peak |
How to choose
Compare the job, not the hype.
Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.
Veo 3.1
Google says paid Gemini API content is not used to improve its products. Generated videos are retained on the server for two days and should be downloaded during that window.
Provider and API links
Veo 3.1 Fast
Google's paid Gemini API terms say prompts and responses are not used to improve its products. Generated Veo videos are stored on the server for two days and must be downloaded to keep them.
Provider and API links
Frequently asked questions
Veo 3.1 vs Veo 3.1 Fast FAQ
What is the main difference between Veo 3.1 and Veo 3.1 Fast?
Veo 3.1: Google's preview video model for text-, image-, and video-guided generation with native audio and output options up to 4K. Veo 3.1 Fast: Google's lower-cost Veo 3.1 variant for quickly creating short video clips with native audio and output options up to 4K.
Should I choose Veo 3.1 or Veo 3.1 Fast?
Consider Veo 3.1 when your priority is Short cinematic clips with native audio. Consider Veo 3.1 Fast when your priority is Rapid ad and social-video variations. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.
Is this Veo 3.1 vs Veo 3.1 Fast comparison based on Cody benchmarks?
No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Video generation category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.