Model comparison
Runway Gen-4.5 vs HappyHorse 1.1
Compare Runway Gen-4.5 and HappyHorse 1.1 using the same provider-sourced video generation rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.
Facts checked September 4, 2026
Model comparison
Compare Runway Gen-4.5 and HappyHorse 1.1 using the same provider-sourced video generation rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.
Facts checked September 4, 2026
Set your usage. Your estimate updates as you type.
Example: 8-second, 720p clips with audio. Models that do not support these settings will not receive an estimate.
Estimates exclude taxes, tools, cache storage/writes, free allowances and custom discounts. Image estimates cover output only, not prompt or reference-image charges. Quality modes differ by model. Unlisted settings are not treated as free.
| Model | Access | Estimated total (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| HappyHorse 1.1HappyHorse | HappyHorse | No reviewed rate |
| Runway Gen-4.5Runway | Runway | No reviewed rate |
Quick take
Runway's flagship developer video model for text- and image-guided clips, with professional formats and a predictable credit-per-second base rate.
Format surcharges can exceed the base generation cost, and the provider does not publish one render-time number across settings.
Alibaba's unified video family for creating short clips with sound from text, a starting image, or a reference video.
The endpoints, accepted references, and defaults are not identical. Check watermark settings, content rules, live per-second pricing, and continuity across each shot before planning a campaign.
Compare the published facts
Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.
| Video generation | Runway Gen-4.5 | HappyHorse 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Generation priceCurrent list price per generated second or the provider's closest billing unit. | 12 credits / sec = $0.12 / sec | Per generated second; use live QwenCloud rate |
| Clip durationDocumented duration choices or maximum clip length. | 2–10 seconds | 3–15 seconds |
| Maximum outputHighest provider-documented output resolution, with relevant constraints. | Endpoint and output-format dependent | 1080p |
| Native audioWhether the endpoint generates synchronized audio with video. | No native audio listed | Yes |
| Input modesSupported text, image, video, reference, or motion inputs. | Text or image to video | Text, first image, or reference video |
| Generation timeOnly shown when a provider publishes a range; not a Cody benchmark. | Not published | Not published |
How to choose
Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.
Data handling depends on the Runway plan and agreement. Review Runway's current terms, workspace controls, and any enterprise commitments before processing confidential media.
Provider and API links
QwenCloud says API inputs and outputs are not retained for model training and are processed in memory. Confirm regional storage and any enabled conversation-storage setting for the exact account.
Provider and API links
Frequently asked questions
Runway Gen-4.5: Runway's flagship developer video model for text- and image-guided clips, with professional formats and a predictable credit-per-second base rate. HappyHorse 1.1: Alibaba's unified video family for creating short clips with sound from text, a starting image, or a reference video.
Consider Runway Gen-4.5 when your priority is Editorial and post-production workflows. Consider HappyHorse 1.1 when your priority is Short concept videos with native sound. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.
No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Video generation category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.